Antiepileptic Drug Titration and Related Health Care Resource Use and Costs

Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy. 2018 Sep;24(9):929-938

BACKGROUND:

Unexpected breakthrough seizures resulting from suboptimal antiepileptic drug (AED) dosing during the titration period, as well as adverse events resulting from rapid AED titration, may influence the titration schedule and significantly increase health care resourceuse (HRU) and health care costs.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the relationship between AEDs, HRU, and costs during AED titration and maintenance.

METHODS:

Practicing neurologists were recruited from a nationwide panel to provide up to 3 patient records each for this retrospective medical chart review. Patients with epilepsy who were aged ≥ 18 years and had initiated an AED between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2016, were followed for 6 months from AED initiation. Titration duration was the time from AED initiation to the beginning of treatment maintenance as determined by the physician. Outcomes were epilepsy-specific HRU (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, physician referral, laboratory testing/diagnostic imaging, and phone calls) and related costs that occurred during the titrationor maintenance treatment periods.

RESULTS:

Of 811 patients, 156, 128, 125, 120, 114, 107, and 61 initiated the following AEDs: levetiracetam, lamotrigine, lacosamide, valproate, topiramate, carbamazepine, and phenytoin, respectively. Most patients (619/803 [77.1%] with complete AED data) received monotherapy. Baseline characteristics were similar across AEDs (mean [SD] age, 36.6 [14.4] years; 59.0% male). Kaplan-Meier estimates of titration duration ranged from 3.3 weeks (phenytoin) to 8.1 weeks (lamotrigine). From titration to maintenance, the overall incidence of HRU per person-month decreased 54.5%-89.3% for each HRU measure except outpatient visits (24.6% decrease). Total epilepsy-related costsdecreased from $80.48 to $42.77 per person-month, or 46.9% from titration to maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS:

AED titration periods had higher HRU rates and costs than AED maintenance, suggesting that use of AEDs with shorter titration requirements reduces health care costs, although disease severity may also factor into overall cost.

DISCLOSURES:

UCB Pharma sponsored this study and reviewed the manuscript. Fishman and Kalilani are employees of UCB Pharma. Wild was an employee of UCB Pharma at the time this analysis was conducted. Song and Swallow are employees of Analysis Group, which received funding from UCB Pharma.

View abstract

Authors

Fishman J, Kalilani L, Song Y, Swallow E, Wild I