A retrospective study evaluating the tolerability and effectiveness of adjunctive antihypertensive drugs in patients with inadequate response to initial treatment
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2018 Jun;20(6):1058-1066
Real-world tolerability and effectiveness of nebivolol as first add-on therapy were compared with hydrochlorothiazide, metoprolol, and amlodipine. Medical records of hypertensive adults initiating nebivolol, hydrochlorothiazide, metoprolol, or amlodipine as first add-on therapy between December 16, 2010 and July 21, 2011 were retrospectively abstracted (N = 1600; 400/treatment). Outcomes included medication-related side-effect rates and blood pressure (BP) reduction and control. Compared with nebivolol, metoprolol and amlodipine had significantly higher side-effect rates (incidence rate ratio [95% CI]: 1.82 [1.14-2.92] and 2.67 [1.69-4.21]), respectively); the hydrochlorothiazide-nebivolol rate ratio was not significant (1.61 [0.95-2.71]). All treatments reduced BP at 2 months. Metoprolol, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide were associated with significantly lower odds of achieving 2-month BP control than nebivolol (odds ratios [95% CI]: 0.34 [0.23-0.51], 0.51 [0.35-0.75] and 0.66 [0.44-0.99], respectively). In a real-world setting, nebivolol as first add-on therapy was associated with fewer side effects than metoprolol or amlodipine and with a higher BP control rate than hydrochlorothiazide, metoprolol, or amlodipine.